These days, your best workers are likely to show more loyalty to their careers than the company. That’s a polite way of saying that your employees are more concerned about themselves than the company where they work. What CEOs need in order to avoid frustration over loyalty is a new view of loyalty and its meaning to employers and employees.
Few business leaders would deny the importance of organizational loyalty; perhaps fewer still believe they can achieve it the way they once did. After all, the lifetime contract expired long ago, and your people, specially your best people, are more likely to display loyalty to their careers than to you, their employer.
The nature of the relationship between employers and employees has undergone a fundamental shift: Today, workers not only don’t expect to work for the same company for ever, they don’t want to. They are largely disillusioned with the very idea of loyalty to organizations. But, at the same time, they don’t really want to shift employers every two to three years for their entire careers. Similarly, companies can’t afford to replace large portions of the workforce on a similar schedule.
So where does this leave us? Is there a way for both employers and employees to strike a brand-new balance when it comes to loyalty, one that gives organizations the focus and expertise they need to compete and employees the career development opportunities they demand?
The answer is yes, but only if companies are willing to rethink how they define loyalty and how they manage their people.
Loyalty should not be viewed as an either/or proposition. It’s true, the experts say, that to produce their best work, employees must be loyal to the company and what it stands for. But employees can give their employers 100 percent and provide great performance while furthering their own careers. The two aren’t mutually exclusive, especially when the skills that employees master to further their own career are also what the company needs.
And when firms help workers acquire new skills that support their professional advancement, they often win those workers’ commitment and attract loyal new employees. This gives rise to another important point: Employers can promote company loyalty by helping people grow out of their jobs—ideally, into new ones within the company.
But even when you can’t retain talent, it doesn’t mean departing employees weren’t loyal. Indeed, another mistaken assumption is that loyalty has to mean “forever.” It’s like dating: You can be faithful to the person you’re seeing now while you’re involved with him or her, but that doesn’t mean you won’t move on to dating someone else later. Likewise, companies shouldn’t strive to keep all employees forever. You don’t want blind loyalty. The best situation is when both parties are benefiting. Wouldn’t you rather have a star performer for three years than a dud for life?
If an employee’s loyalties to his career and to an employer aren’t mutually exclusive, how can leaders ensure that the employee-employer relationship pays off for both parties? The most effective executives and managers are applying these strategies:
In summary, employee loyalty does still exist, both for themselves and the company. While the employees are with you, they can be 100% loyal to the company. Just because an employee chooses to leave does not mean they have not been 100% loyal to the company up until the time they leave. To retain your best employees, align fulfillment of their career goals with the company mission.